Collaboration Multi-Actors in Poverty Alleviation in Kendari City, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/modern.v5i4.52Keywords:
Collaborative Governance, Kendari City, Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration, Poverty Alleviation, Public PolicyAbstract
This study examines multi-stakeholder collaboration in poverty alleviation efforts in Kendari City, Indonesia. The research aims to analyze forms of collaboration among government, NGOs, academia, private sector, and local communities, highlighting its contribution to governance and welfare policy literature. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through interviews, focus group discussions, observations, and document analysis between January–June 2025. Findings reveal that collaboration is facilitated by local regulations, leadership, and community participation, yet constrained by bureaucratic rigidity, limited funding, and institutional capacity gaps. The study concludes that collaborative governance enhances coordination and innovation in poverty reduction, with implications for strengthening institutional design, transparency, and community-based approaches in local policy
References
Aguilar, G. R., & Sumner, A. (2020). Who are the world’s poor? A new profile of global multidimensional poverty. World Development, 126, 104716.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross‐sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203643457
Oxfam International. (2023). Survival of the richest: How we must tax the super-rich now to fight inequality. Oxfam Briefing Paper. https://doi.org/10.21201/2023.5411
Poverty, O., & Human Development Initiative. (2018). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2018: The most detailed picture to date of the world’s poorest people. University of Oxford, UK.
Purwanto, E. A., & Sulistyastuti, D. R. (2012). Implementasi kebijakan publik: Konsep dan aplikasinya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297580.001.0001
Tadung, E., Alwi, & Susanti, G. (2025). Multi stakeholder collaboration in implementing poverty alleviation policies in Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi. Malikussaleh Social and Political Reviews, 6(2), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.29103/mspr.v6i2.25120
World Bank. (2022). Poverty and shared prosperity 2022: Correcting course. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1893-6.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
